|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Interesting cesarean sectionFrom: ainsron@msn.comTue Mar 20 17:07:23 2001
At Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Efrain Ramirez wrote: > >No - I have not! but seems to me you did the right thing. No true lower >segment and you wanted to deliver this baby as *smooth" as possible >--right? The real reason for doing it as a classical C/S was simply access to the uterus. We were operating through a large subcostal incision. It was quite a stretch to do it through the incision we had and there was no way we could reach the lower uterine segment without T-ing the incision or making another suprapubic incision. Neither seemed like reasonable options to me.
-- Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:49:49 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.