Re: Radiation and pregnancy

From: ainsron@msn.com
Mon Mar 12 09:58:42 2001


In addition to what the others have said, there is a common misconception about the dangers of radiation exposure during pregnancy. Doses less than 5 rads are not expected to produce embryonic death or malformations, and it is inappropriate to recommend termination of a wanted pregnancy. The probable exposure for this patient is 200-500mrad. She also was exposed in the pre-implantation stage which is probably safer than during the later stages of organogenesis.

>Patient 38 y.o,para II,is now pregnant.Probable date of
>fertilization 10 of February.On February 13,she underwent
>barium enema ,she had 3 films.
> The question is:Termination or not.The patient desires the baby.
> Dr.S.Savvas
> Ob/Gyn
> Cyprus

--
Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:47:50 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.