-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: c/s rate and midwives From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Thu Mar 8 06:27:14 2001 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Gail Waldby: "Re: Not so hypothetical question" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: update on superfetation vs severe IUGR" In reply to: Kathi Wilson: "Re: c/s rate and midwives" Next in thread: Kaycnm@aol.com: "Re: c/s rate and midwives" then why use it at all? and why do our so-called societies put up with such nonsense? in fact, each day it must get increasingly difficult to justify those dues. art At Wed, 07 Mar 2001, Kathi Wilson wrote: > >"art fougner, md" wrote: > >> At Wed, 07 Mar 2001, Kathi Wilson wrote: >> Kathi - >> >> but that is precisely the question - why is the section rate a valid >> measure of outcome? > >Oh, all right, Art. I think that, as a raw number, obviously, it ain't. And, as >someone stated, you need to look at perinatal morbidity/mortality (fetal and >maternal), but, again, with examining the proper parameter as markers of outcome. >Difficult issue, and not easily solved. > >-- >Kathi Wilson, RM >Ilderton, Ontario, Canada >mailto:wilsonk@gtn.on.ca >********************** >Thames Valley Midwives >********************** >346 Platts Lane, >London, Ontario, Canada > >http://tvm.on.ca >mailto:info@tvm.on.ca > -- art fougner, md A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote. Next message: Gail Waldby: "Re: Not so hypothetical question" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: update on superfetation vs severe IUGR" In reply to: Kathi Wilson: "Re: c/s rate and midwives" Next in thread: Kaycnm@aol.com: "Re: c/s rate and midwives"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:49:48 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.