-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Breech, was c/s rate and midwives From: Braun, R. Daniel (rbraun@iupui.edu) Wed Mar 7 13:51:01 2001 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: K Dew: "Query the group" Previous message: Harrison Sheld: "Re: SAB and quant" Maybe in reply to: John Robertson MD: "Breech, was c/s rate and midwives" Next in thread: art fougner, md: "Re: c/s rate and midwives" And I couldn't agree more. On both accounts. Dan -----Original Message----- From: Griffiths Malcolm (RC9) Luton & Dunstable Hospital TR[mailto:Malcolm.Griffiths@ldh-tr.anglox.nhs.uk] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 2:21 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Breech, was c/s rate and midwives My opinion too! And I used to love doing breeches vaginally! -----Original Message----- From: evsono@pipeline.com [mailto:evsono@pipeline.com] Sent: 07 March 2001 16:37 To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Breech, was c/s rate and midwives John - so they're shooting the messenger in the great white north eh? interesting how folks tout evidence when it reinforces their beliefs, then criticize it when its findings oppose them. we should all give Dr. Hannah a collective Thank You for helping us solve a difficult issue. just my opinion, i could be wrong. art At Wed, 7 Mar 2001, John Robertson MD wrote: > >At Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Kathi Wilson wrote: > >Poor Dr. Hannah. SNIP > >-- >J.G.M.Robertson MD, 109-9181 Main St. Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 4M9 >(604) 793-9988 e-mail john.robertson@obgyn.net >Who is wise and understanding among you? Let him show it by his good life, >by deeds done in the humility that comes from wisdom. James 3 vs 13, NIV > -- art fougner, md A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** Next message: K Dew: "Query the group" Previous message: Harrison Sheld: "Re: SAB and quant" Maybe in reply to: John Robertson MD: "Breech, was c/s rate and midwives" Next in thread: art fougner, md: "Re: c/s rate and midwives"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:47:50 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.