|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: 'The Gynaecologist' QuarterlyFrom: Belal Hossain (bhossain@doctor.com)Wed Mar 7 02:40:27 2001
Dr Ahmed. I understand your frustrations of being a male OB/GYN in a country where literacy rate is <50% and religious outlook, practically speaking,forces women to deal with men other than their husbands, like an Alien.Reports are coming,in USA even, female OB/GYN are ahead of that of opposite sex so far as popularity is concerned though actual fact they can unveil.Anyhow I can mail you papers on different topics based on statistical evidence,particularly on the topics of population,female literacy rate, contraception,acceptance of different methods of contraceptions,failures etc.these are my favourite topics outside my clinic practice. Dr Belal Hossain MD Group Practice Kolaghat.WB INDIA -----Original Message----- > >Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:25:34 -0600 (CST) >From: dr_naseemahmad@yahoo.com (Dr.Naseem Ahmad) >To: OB-GYN-L@OBGYN.NET >Subject: 'The Gynaecologist' Quarterly >Message-ID: <200102241525.JAA17531@mail.medispecialty.com> > >I am a fellow of the royal college of obgyn. I visit the RCOG forum now >an then and I left an appeal on the forum to help me out in my >endeavours to make the journal The Gynaecologist Quarterly a success. >This may sound odd but the background is taht there is not a single >journal on Gynaecology in the whole country (Pakistan) The specialty of >obgyn, may I hasten to add, is predominantly occupied by lady >gynaecologists and I happen to be one of less than 10 male >gynaecologists in the entire country. I have my own private hospital >and in early ninetees I used to publish the same journal. At that time >the journal was similar to any other research journal and I had some big >international names on the editorial board. Unfortunately it had to be >stopped due to almost non-existent support from any local gynaecolgist >and interestingly I was subjected to a kind of mockery by putting so >much effort and finance for no good reason. Recently I changed the set >up and converted it into a kind of CME journal. This has generated >excellent applause from junior gynaecologists but the senior ones are >still sort of opposed to it. Is it not funny. Interestingly I >personally bear the expenses and distribute the journal to about 6000 >doctors without ant material support from usually so generous >pharmaceutical companies. This is a very useful journal and I have >completely devoted myself to it. The standard is excellent and it has >become a point of prestige and challenge for me to continue it >permanently. The RCOG forum I am ashamed to say paid no heed to it >despite my plea to contribute to this journal. Recently I was >introduced to the obgyn Forum and I am impressed with the enthusiasm and >a feeling of espirit de corps among the professinals. I was wondering >if having read my woeful tale participants of the Forum would advise me >and help me out. I find the participants a lot different to what I find >in the RCOG forum. Sorry for taking your time but I hope readers will >appreciate my concern. Many thanks >Naseem Ahmad MD FRCOG > ______________________________________________ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com -- ______________________________________________ Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:47:50 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.