Re: c/s rate and midwives

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue Mar 6 19:50:15 2001


well, Betsy, from the gist of the posts - that's exactly what's happening. and for the OB's it's in reverse. what is happening with many is that if the OB is covering a midwife or FP who is not formally associated with the group, then his/her denominator is not including the deliveries of those referring. not only is this unfair but it begs the real question - again, why is section rate an outcome measure?

art

At Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Betsy Hyde wrote: >
>At 5:47 PM 3/6/01, Paul Prior MD wrote:
>
>>Amazing that every midwife I've ever worked with also had a 0% c/s
>>rate....
>>
>well, that shouldn't be, and I'm amazed that this is becoming such a
>difficult concept to get through to folks.
>
>Each midwife (of FP) should count c/s for women in her/his care during
>labor. *no* one who attends laboring women has a c/s rate of 0!
>
>c/s rates reflect judgement and management. consultation and transfer of
>care for dysfunctional labor *does* occur. And midwives (and FPs) should
>include this in their c/s rates.
>
>--
>Betsy Hyde CNM
>Branford, CT
>

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:47:50 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.