Re: Testerone for decreased libido

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Sun Mar 4 16:14:38 2001


those so-called "pure scientists" are often not so pure and not terribly scientific. remember, mathematics, the purest of sciences, is based on assumptions.

art

At Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Efrain Ramirez wrote: >
>"There are no facts, only interpretations."
>
>J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2000;9 Suppl 1:S9-13 (ISSN: 1524-6094)
> De Cherney AH
>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los
>Angeles School of Medicine, 90055,
> USA.
>There is only inferential evidence based on observational studies and
>deductive reasoning that allows us to
>suppose there are hormone receptors in the human brain that are
>associated with libido. Data indicate that
>sexually active pubescent women have higher testosterone levels than
>matched controls. However, any
>number of nonhormonal events in puberty could be related to these
>changes. Another circuitous way to
>look at hormone libido receptors in the brain is by evaluating patients
>on birth control pills, in whom sexual
>activity paradoxically decreases. Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG)
>levels are increased, and,
>therefore, free testosterone levels seem to be affected by the use of
>birth control pills. In addition, the
>progestins in the pill are 19-nortestosterone derivatives, which may
>have some androgenic effect in their
>own right. Women on estrogen replacement therapy with the addition of
>testosterone seem to report
>increased libido, and there is subjective information that there is an
>increase in psychological sense of
>well-being. It has been well documented that females with adrenogenital
>syndrome are masculinized in
>utero, indicating imprinting on behavior. Because of the nature of the
>end point (e.g., increased libido), it is
>difficult to draw concrete conclusions on the presence of libido
>receptors in the human brain. Because the
>outcomes and end points are so soft, it is difficult to come to a
>consensus, and in fact this topic polarizes
>opinions of the pure scientist (objective) against the clinician
>(subjective). At Sun, 04 Mar 2001, Mark Perloe wrote:
>>
>>>Because of the absence of convincing evidence of significant and direct
>>>net benefit on a long term basis, I rarely prescribe an androgenic
>>>agent.
>>
>>Zach,
>>
>>I agree with your decision not to prescribe androgens. I am foften referred
>>menopausal patients who have failed HRT and find androgens levels well in
>>excess of normal premenopausal levels. This is often accompanied by an
>>adverse shift in lipid profiles as well. Interestingly, women with PCOS
>>usually have elevated androgens levels and if they behaved like
>>testosterone-treated rats, should be trying to seduce furniture. This is
>>definitely not the case. These hyperandrogenic women usually find decreased
>>libido a prominent component of their PCOS symptomatology. My take is that
>>an abrupt cessation of ovarian androgen production following bilateral
>>oophorectomy may explain some cases of decreased libido. Other
>>endocrinologic conditions I have seen in women with decreased libido are
>>hyperprolactinemia and hypothyroidism. But, I don't think we can call upon
>>evidence based medicine to treat these women. This brings me to another
>>concern.
>>
>>While evidence based medicine (EBM) has allowed us to abandon many
>>ineffective treatment regimens, unfortunately it has been used to refuse
>>coverage for many treatments that have not yet undergone EBM validation. We
>>must be careful not to fall into the trap that equates a lack of evidence
>>(EBM double blind randomized clinical trial) with lack of clinical benefit.
>>If we remove clinical judgement from the picture and reduce medicine to
>>merely allocating patients to the appropriate EBM clinical pathway, we will
>>be become medical technicians and provides and not healers.
>>
>>--
>>Mark Perloe, M.D. http://grs.ivf.com 404-843-2229
>>5445 Meridian Mark Rd, Suite 270, Atlanta, GA 30342
>>
>--
>"Life is neither the notes nor the silence between the notes, but the music that
> arises out of sound and silence felt as a living whole. Stop choosing...between
> chaos and order, and live at the boundary between them, where rest and action
> move together..." David Whyte
>

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:49:48 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.