Re: article 2
From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Wed Feb 21 10:52:52 2001
sure i read your article Bob - despite the fact that i often disagree -
i enjoy your usually thoughtful and rational posts.
art
At Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Robert J. Woolley wrote:
>
>In message <200102211540.JAA04903@mail.medispecialty.com> writes:
>> imagine the outrage of the family of a deceased son shot to death by a
>> gun totin, shoot first, ask questions later empowered woman with an
>> inferiority complex.
>
>Imagine the outrage of the family of the woman raped and killed by her jealous
>ex-boyfriend, who couldn't defend herself because of stupid laws and policies
>that made it illegal to defend herself effectively.
>
> not sure that arming everyone is the answer here,
>> Bob.
>
>Apparently you didn't read what I wrote, or you would have seen this sentence:
>
>"Being armed is obviously not for everyone. "
>
>Or is your reading comprehension somewhat low?
>
>--
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Bob Woolley
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>St. Paul, Minnesota
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>GIC
>
>"But at this stage some have not armed themselves, and the duly
>armed win the day. Not even a God would have the right to deal
>a blow for the unwarlike: the law decrees that to come safe out
>of battle is for fighting men, not for those that pray."
>
> -- Plotinus
>
--
art fougner, md
A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.
