-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Advice on refuting claims of negligence in Birth injury From: Griffiths Malcolm (Malcolm.Griffiths@ldh-tr.anglox.nhs.uk) Mon Feb 19 04:23:53 2001 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Richard Chudacoff, MD: "Re: GBS--again" Previous message: Griffiths Malcolm: "Re: opinions/management suggestions" Maybe in reply to: Chris Dr.: "Advice on refuting claims of negligence in Birth injury" Next in thread: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: Advice on refuting claims of negligence in Birth injury" Having read the appeal court decision in the case from the web-page, I am left with the impression that Nathanson is very much a hired gun. We certainly don't have experts like that over here! I have to say though that simply lecturing to lawyers doesn't make on a hired gun. I have taken part in programmes to give lawyers the basics of obstetrics, simply so they can understand what a case is about. I am due to lecture to a firm of defendant lawyers on Wednesday on the subject of risk management in O&G. I am no hired gun! -----Original Message----- From: ENDODOK@aol.com [mailto:ENDODOK@aol.com] Sent: 18 February 2001 21:54 To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Advice on refuting claims of negligence in Birth injury I had an immediate boot-up of this article via the link. It is interesting that the plaintiff's expert witness , Dr Nathanson, has been associated with New York trial lawyers specializing in bad baby cases as far back as the 70's-80's. I attended a "course" entitled "Medical Malpractice- the Brain Damaged Baby" in San Francisco, sponsored by New York Law Press. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they -- are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** Next message: Richard Chudacoff, MD: "Re: GBS--again" Previous message: Griffiths Malcolm: "Re: opinions/management suggestions" Maybe in reply to: Chris Dr.: "Advice on refuting claims of negligence in Birth injury" Next in thread: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: Advice on refuting claims of negligence in Birth injury"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:41:13 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.