Re: OB: AFP triple re-calculations

From: Joanne Bulley (islesannie@yahoo.com)
Tue Jan 30 21:35:22 2001


No. Manage as any other Tri-Screen with a 1:215 risk...

At Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Garry Siegel wrote: >
>I am aware that AFP triple screening is dependent on dates, and I
>believe that the ultrasound EDC from a first trimester scan is "better"
>than the LMP generated date.
>
>So, now you see a patient at 8 to 9 weeks, and her LMP is
>perfect/regular/known/28 days/no pills/yada, and her vagscan is within 5
>days. If you are like me, her EDC is based on the LMP, and that's
>that--the scan corroborates it, but doesn't change it.
>
>Now, she's 16.3 weeks, and the triscreen is abnormal with an increased
>Down risk of 1:215 (she is 32 years old), using 16 weeks, which was
>based on the LMP.
>
>Do you ask the lab to recalculate, in that if you use the scan EDC, it
>makes her 15.7 weeks when the test was done?
>
>Garry
>
>--
>Garry E. Siegel, M.D., F.A.C.O.G.
>Roswell, GA
>Private Practice
>

--
Joanne Bulley, MD, FACOG
Keene, NH, USA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:47:08 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.