Re: Lunelle/contraception coverage

From: Joanne Bulley (islesannie@yahoo.com)
Tue Jan 30 21:06:08 2001


Bob - it costs LESS to provide contraceptive coverage than to cover pregnancy, childbirth and children's medical care vaccines etc.

It has been well shown that women on OCP's spend fewer health dollars - so why NOT cover it? That is why HMO's were the first to routinely cover OCP's.

At Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Robert J Woolley wrote: >
>The inevitable result of mandating this coverage is that the cost of
>insurance will go up, which means that some additional number of people
>will become uninsured. You may not *want* this result, but it will surely
>happen. Apparently you think that having X number of women be able to get
>their contraceptives for free is worth having Y number of people
>uninsured. Right?

--
Joanne Bulley, MD, FACOG
Keene, NH, USA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:47:08 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.