Re: OB: Advanced Maternal Age

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue Dec 26 10:55:20 2000


"It ain't over til it's over."

Lawrence Peter Berra

art

At Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Dean Huffman wrote: >
>About a year ago I had a consult of a patient, age 35, who was an
>ultrasound technician. So was her husband. All four of us, the
>patient, her husband, my ultrasonographer, and myself, all thought the
>fetus appeared normal. She had not done a triple screen. After the
>ususal discussion, including the predicted risks of Downs based on age
>and a normal appearing ultrasund, she decided to do the amniocetnesis
>anyway.
>
>It came back 47 +21.
>
>A week ago, I had another patient with a normal appearing ultrasound and
>only minimally increased risk of Downs on triple screen (about 1:250).
>She also requested amniocentesis and, again, a 47 +21.
>
>Short of amniocentesis (possibly maternal blood testing for fetal
>chromosomes in the future), the patient has to realize that she is
>playing the numbers.
>
>--
>Dean Huffman
>
>- - - -
>
>At Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Efrain Ramirez wrote:
>>
>>Bit skeptical about it -- recently had a 28? y/o negative --I mean
>>really negative screen for DS (odds in the thousands)-- had DS - I still
>>believe that it is not sensitive enough - even with the inhibin stuff.
>>
>>If you have a MFM -- REALLY good at U/S you can cut in half the odds -
>>but - still I am not convinced.I might change my mind --though.
>>
>>At Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Geffrey Klein, MD wrote:
>>>
>>>Any thoughts on this Green Journal Article?
>>>
>>>Efficacy of Screening for Fetal Down's Syndrome in the US from 1974
>>>to 1997. Egan etal Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:979-85
>>>
>>>Essentially they are saying that the idea of offering amnio to women
>>>who will 35 or older at delivery is no longer valid and that triple
>>>screen should be used instead..
>>>
>>>--
>>>_______________________
>>>Geffrey H. Klein, MD
>>>_______________________
>>>_______________________
>>>_______________________
>>>geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
>>>200 Medical Center Blvd Suite 103
>>>Webster, TX 77598
>>>(281) 332 6723
>>>
>>>http://www.geffreyklein.com
>>>
>>--
>>"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive."
>>
>>Marianne Williamson
>>

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:46:43 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.