GYN: Post - Tubal Ligation Syndrome?

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Thu Dec 7 06:24:33 2000


this in today's New England Journal -

The Risk of Menstrual Abnormalities after Tubal Sterilization Herbert B. Peterson, Gary Jeng, Suzanne G. Folger, Susan A. Hillis, Polly A. Marchbanks, Lynne S. Wilcox, for the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Abstract -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Background. The existence of a post-tubal-ligation syndrome of

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
menstrual abnormalities has been debated for decades.  We used data from
the U.S.  Collaborative Review of Sterilization to determine whether the
likelihood of persistent menstrual abnormalities was greater among women
who had undergone tubal sterilization than among women who had not.

Methods. A total of 9514 women who underwent tubal sterilization and 573 women whose partners underwent vasectomy were followed in a multicenter, prospective cohort study for up to five years by means of annual telephone interviews. All women were asked the same questions about six characteristics of their menstrual cycles in the presterilization and follow-up interviews. Multiple logistic-regression analysis was used to assess the risk of persistent menstrual changes.

Results. The women who had undergone sterilization were no more likely than those who had not undergone the procedure to report persistent changes in intermenstrual bleeding or the length of the menstrual cycle. They were more likely to have decreases in the number of days of bleeding (odds ratio, 2.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 5.2), the amount of bleeding (odds ratio, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.0), and menstrual pain (odds ratio, 1.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.8) and to have an increase in cycle irregularity (odds ratio, 1.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.3). Among women who had had very heavy bleeding at base line, women who had undergone sterilization were more likely than women who had not undergone the procedure to report decreased bleeding (45 percent vs. 33 percent, P=0.03).

Conclusions. Women who have undergone tubal sterilization are no more likely than other women to have menstrual abnormalities. (N Engl J Med 2000;343:1681-7.)

Source Information >From the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. Address reprint requests to Dr. Peterson at the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop K-34, 4770 Buford Hwy., NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724.

The members of the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group are listed in the Appendix.

Appendix The members of the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group are as follows: Design, coordination, and analysis center, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta -- H.B. Peterson (principal investigator), J.M. Hughes, Z. Xia, L.S. Wilcox, L.R. Tylor, J. Trussell; Data Collection Centers -- N.G. Courey, State University of New York at Buffalo, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, N.Y.; P.D. Darney, University of California, San Francisco; E.R. Friedrich, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; R.W. Hale and R.T. Nakayama, Kapiolani Medical Center, Honolulu; J.F. Hulka, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; A.N. Poindexter, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; G.M. Ryan and E.M. Thorpe, University of Tennessee School of Medicine, Memphis; G.K. Stewart (deceased), Planned Parenthood of Sacramento, Sacramento, Calif.; H.A. Zacur and L. Blanco, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore.

have a happy!

art

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:46:42 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.