Re: Euthanasia & Death Penalty

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Wed Dec 6 13:28:17 2000


yup - i can see where more courts and lawyers seem to be an increasingly popular solution to societies problems.

art

At Wed, 6 Dec 2000, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: >
>In a message dated 12/6/00 12:59:57 PM, evsono@pipeline.com writes:
>
><< strange that euthanasia is viewed as cost-effective yet death penalty
>most certainly is not.
>
>art >>
>
>That's because a dead patient incurs no further medical costs (only the
>undertaker), while the death penalty incurs YEARS of appeals and legal fees
>and etc. And remember, the death penalty is AUTOMATICALLY appealed, even if
>the condemned WANTS TO die.
>
>Joe P.

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:49:00 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.