Re: OB: AFP Triscreens in subsequent pregnancies

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Wed Nov 8 08:30:52 2000


Garry -

the only info i could find concerning subsequent pregnancies was that women who were screen positive were less apt to accept serum screening in a following pregnancy. couldn't find anything about repeat performers - sounds like a wonderful subject for review tho.

art

At Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Garry Siegel wrote: >
>I'm doing a medline, but curious. Does anyone have any thoughts/data
>references regarding a question I was asked today.
>
>The patient said that since her AFP triscreens had been normal with her
>two prior pregnancies, does that make her chances of it being normal
>this time better/worse/no different?
>
>My gut says that each is an independent event, and that as she ages, the
>likelihood of an abnormal result with respect to Down sceening will be
>increased.
>
>Garry
>
>--
>Garry E. Siegel, M.D., F.A.C.O.G.
>Roswell, GA
>Private Practice
>

--
art fougner, md

A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:48:46 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.