Re: The 'Infamous' Ina May Gaskin

From: ginny lee BSN, GNM (kaupilimakoa@hotmail.com)
Wed Sep 27 12:00:58 2000


One of our docs also stated that you *must* cut a episioproctotomy or you will fry in court...he stated that it will give you a full cm of extra room, not for hand maneuvers, but basically so the posterior shoulder will drop into the rectum...scary! BTW, we didn't have a physical education requirement in my midwifery program, and I can't bench press more that 75 lbs or so, but I can run a 3:20 marathon, so hopefully will just outrun the lawyers :)

Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote: >
>Well, maybe El could take us through the symphysotomy again. Isn't that
>where you have all those patients clicking when they walk? While I have
>never needed to do one, and would never suggest it at the oral boards, I do
>keep it in my back pocket as a maneuver of last resort.
>
>Rick
>
>--
>Richard Chudacoff, MD
>Chudacoff Obstetrics & Gynecology, PLLC
>
>15200 Southwest Freeway, #270
>Sugar Land, TX 77478
>Tel: 281-277-3900
>Fax: 281-277-3901
>
>rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com
>Richard.Chudacoff@obgyn.net
>**********************************************************************
>Neither the confidentiality nor the integrity of this message
>**********************************************************************

>can be guaranteed following transmission on the Internet.
>**********************************************************************
>
>**********************************************************************

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net]On Behalf Of Kathi
>Wilson
>Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 9:06 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Re: The 'Infamous' Ina May Gaskin
>
>"Anna Meenan, MD" wrote:
>
>> I have seen the Shoulder Dystocia video from
>> the Farm and I would call it a definite shoulder dystocia--positive
>> turtle sign, purple baby head, the works.
>
>Actually, having seen that video as well, it's not even close to what I
>would
>consider "the works". The works is the birth I had last spring, in which
>*both* shoulders were hung up -- ant on the symphysis and posterior
>presumably
>on the sacral promentory. I had my hand up the vagina past my wrist before
>I
>could touch the posterior axilla -- with the mother on hands and knees.
>Previously, I had tried lateral traction w/ McRoberts, symphysis pubis
>pressure
>and Rubins. That kid didn't budge an iota. Nor did it budge once the
>mother
>flipped to hands and knees. I cut a huge mediolateral epis, and shoved my
>whole hand in before I could get to that axilla and get some purchase on
>something to start to Woodscrew that kid out. Baby was born w/o heartbeat
>or
>respirations -- about 5 - 6 minutes from head to body. Full blown resus,
>with
>the result that the 1 minute Apgar was 3 and the 5 minute Apgar was about 6.
>Sarnet Stage I hypoxic insult. That kid took *years* off my life, but is
>now a
>healthy BIG six month old. *My* criteria is that I suffered a rotator cuff
>injury and muscle pull getting that baby out that still bugs me. And got
>aggravated w/ the next one (in which I couldn't put the mother in hands and
>knees because she had a broken arm).
>
>> Why is McRobert's maneuver
>> considered a shoulder dystocia maneuver if we are going to say that any
>> shoulder dystocia that resolves with McRoberts maneuver was not a
>> shoulder dystocia in the first place? Obviously it is a matter of
>> degree. There are bad shoulder dystocias and there are not-so-bad
>> shoulder dystocias. The point of the all-fours maneuver is that ALL of
>> the babies in the registry so far were delivered with an almost complete
>> absence of morbidity.
>
>Lots of people in my institution will use McRoberts preemptively if they
>think
>a baby might have sticky shoulders. Doesn't mean there was one. I still do
>not believe that getting a mother to lie back in McRoberts resolves a true
>shoulder dystocia -- it often means that she wasn't optimally positioned in
>the
>first place!
>
>Although I haven't attended Betsy's volume of births, I, too, would say that
>I've only had three real SD's, which to me means that you really have to
>*work*
>to get that kid out. Hands and knees is a valuable trick, but it's not
>magic,
>and I wouldn't count on it to work if a baby is really, really stuck in
>there.
>
>--
>Kathi Wilson, RM
>Ilderton, Ontario, Canada
>mailto:wilsonk@gtn.on.ca
>**********************
>Thames Valley Midwives
>**********************

>346 Platts Lane,
>London, Ontario, Canada
>
>http://tvm.on.ca
>mailto:info@tvm.on.ca
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Fri Jan 2 04:41:35 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.