![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: AROM vs Pit for inductionFrom: Joanne Bulley, MD (jbulley@cheshire.net)Tue Aug 29 21:00:13 2000
I was always a proponent of AROM ASAP - before Pit if everything was favorable. then I had a G4P3 woman at 3-4 cm - and the head *seemed* to be against the cervix... So ... AROM and in under 10 minutes there was this deceleration - and yes, indeed, I had a cord prolapse. As I was sectioning this multip because I did the AROM - I got a bit scared off. So I went back to - more often than not - waiting to AROM until there were contractions & I could do it during a contraction. So - if real certain of the stability of the station - then AROM, wait 1-2 hours and start Pit if needed, or start Pit, AROM as soon as contractions begin - and back off on the Pit in most cases... Joanne
At Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Caitlin Cusack MD wrote:
>
-- Joanne Bulley, MD Keene, NH, USA
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:47:26 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.