![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: AROM vs Pit for inductionFrom: Vivienne Souter (viv@seaultrasound.com)Tue Aug 29 18:57:49 2000
Larry I am uncertain why anyone would flame you for this. Surely induction is accelerated by AROM in conjunction with pitocin (PG's released potentiating the action of pitocin on the uterus). Granted, contractions may be more painful for the patient after AROM but I'm not sure why anyone would want to induce labour slowly as opposed to efficiently. AROM does commit you to delivering the patient but in most cases, shouldn't patients only be induced when the indication for induction is strong enough that the doctor would be prepared to perform a Caesarean should the induction fail? Viv Larry Glazerman wrote:
> The only time I'll use pit with intact membranes is if the membranes can't
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:47:26 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.