![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
In a Fat Woman? How fat is that? Specify please.From: Ann Hillard (ann.hillard@talk21.com)Mon Aug 14 00:03:36 2000
At Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Steve & Eryl Raymond wrote: > >Upper abdominal incisions are prone to herniation - more so than >lower abdominal. In a fat woman the transverse is better - heals >better, less chance of hernia, but is obviously more difficult from >the access point of view. If done higher than the classical >Pfannenstiel site however, can still be a whole lot better bet than a >midline overall. > >On 12 Aug 2000, at 17:50, Garry E. Siegel wrote: > >Kevin: > >I think we've discussed this before, but did you consider an upper >midline incision above the umbilicus? Works very well in very heavy >women. > >Garry > >Dr. Steve Raymond >Head of Department of O & G >Empangeni Hospital >Empangeni >SOUTH AFRICA 3880 >Ph:(+27)(035)77721111
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:47:24 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.