-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: CS response time From: Efrain Ramirez (eramirez@icepr.com) Tue Jul 18 07:23:28 2000 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: art fougner, md: "Re: CS response time" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: CS response time" In reply to: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: CS response time" Next in thread: Paul Prior MD: "Re: CS response time" I work in an institution that has the availability --and I have been doing VBAC's for a long, long time (no in house anesthesia-etc.- good results -- lucky-- -- what I am saying is that the society will have to decide what they want -- better yet --the courts will -- everything has some price - not all people can afford it all -- VBAC's should be ban in ANY institution that does not meet the criteria - period let's be honest about it!! and see the C/S rate rise -- so what? - --let's wait and see.. At Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Braun, R. Daniel wrote: > >Let me see, now. I hear us saying that we don't want to pay the price of >establishing units with "immediate availability for an expeditious delivery" >in order to do more VBAC's and lower the cesarean rate. Is that what I >hear?? > >Dan Standing back and awaiting the responses. > >R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG >Clinical Professor >Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology >Indiana U. School of Medicine >Indianapolis, IN 46202 > >OBGYN.net >International Representative for United States > >Certified AllExperts Expert >Check out my bio/ratings page! >http://www.allexperts.com/displayExpert.asp?Expert=1236 > >-----Original Message----- >From: eramirez@icepr.com [mailto:eramirez@icepr.com] >Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 6:36 AM >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L >Subject: Re: CS response time > >At Mon, 17 Jul 2000, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: > >Allowing VBAC's with their "new" standard and saying that they want to >lower the C/S is ludicrous - how many places have "immediate >availability for an expeditious delivery"? IN ADDITION, they tie this >argument with the examples of a prolapsed cord -etc. It is a dilemma >for me- what are they REALLY trying to convey to the obstetrician AND >the public? > >>Wait... WHY is this a dilemma???? If they have an opinion... there should >be >>a specific C/S rate... VBACs are good... then WHY a dilemma? They should >just >>stand up and state what they believe is the truth. On the other hand, if >>they're trying to push some unproven or theoretical practice which they >FEEL >>is correct, and they really have little to base it on but their OWN >opinion, >>then they're in a dilemma no matter what they do... >> >>Joe P. > >-- >"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive." > >Marianne Williamson > -- "Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive." Marianne Williamson Next message: art fougner, md: "Re: CS response time" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: CS response time" In reply to: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: CS response time" Next in thread: Paul Prior MD: "Re: CS response time"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Mar 2 04:46:40 2010

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.