|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Another Interesting VBACFrom: Luis Sanchez-Ramos, MD (luis.sanchez@jax.ufl.edu)Wed Jul 12 06:48:51 2000
At Tue, 11 Jul 2000, John Robertson MD wrote:
>>Dr. Mary Hannah (of the term prom study etc.) stopped the term breech study because of interm analysis of data which suggested that C/S was safer for breeches<< I wonder if the study was discontinued for the reason given. I understand that they had difficulty in getting centers and patients to participate...so much so, that they were thinking of stopping the study all together. Many centers did not want to participate, for one reason or another. For example, some centers did not participate because they "believed" in vaginal breech deliveries and did not want to perform cesareans just because of randomization; others "believed" in cesarean deliveries for all breech presentations and did not want to allocate a patient to the vaginal delivery group. LSR
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:47:02 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.