|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Another Interesting VBACFrom: Efrain Ramirez (eramirez@icepr.com)Sat Jul 8 15:11:43 2000
At Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Geffrey Klein, MD wrote:
>agree that it is reasonable not to do ECV with prior CS. But it is not an abslute contranindication
>sloppy. I suspect this means that the cervix was not even dilated Having an U/S at LDR helps a lot - any doubt just drop the transducer on the belly.
>Induction of prior cs with cervidil in direct violation of package insert. As well as terbutaline IV - Cervidil same as Prostin - I believe there is no big problem with that.
>>those candidates who do not require much intervention yet it's a choice I want In my hands -- easy VBAC or easy C/S - that's the bottom line.
>still not enough data.. cervical exam, progress, and tracing the Absolutely agree
>--
-- "Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive."
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:44:54 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.