![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Another Interesting VBACFrom: Geffrey Klein, MD (gklein@icsi.net)Sat Jul 8 08:53:44 2000
At 1:31 AM -0500 on 7/8/00, Tonya Von Brooks, CPM wrote:
>Geff , agree that it is reasonable not to do ECV with prior CS.
> No further sloppy. I suspect this means that the cervix was not even dilated enough to feel the presenting part.
>Induced labor at 40 weeks and 4 days .- Started cervidil am - day one . Induction of prior cs with cervidil in direct violation of package insert.
>( I don't know why they didn't use an internal monitor - this Pt. might have still not enough data.. cervical exam, progress, and tracing the most important details here... -- _______________________ Geffrey H. Klein, MD _______________________ geffrey.klein@obgyn.net 200 Medical Center Blvd Suite 103 Webster, TX 77598 (281) 332 6723
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:44:54 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.