Re: Another Interesting VBAC

From: Tonya Von Brooks, CPM (nbwc@ix.netcom.com)
Sat Jul 8 01:30:52 2000


Geff , I was able to obtain a little more data on the vbac case I posted .Here it is although far from complete Three weeks before labor the baby was dx'd as breech . The physician decline a request for a version on a scarred uterus . No further Uss done . Physician felt baby vtx . Pt . told him she did not feel baby move and kicking was in the same places. . Induced labor at 40 weeks and 4 days .- Started cervidil am - day one . Pt desired vbac and natural childbirth .Cervidil for 12 hours produced Uc's 30 seconds long and 2 minutes apart .Pt reports Uc's seemed painful . erratic tracing by external monitor . It was difficult to keep monitor on fetal heart . Fhr was found to be high on abdomen but it was difficult to get a good tracing . ( I don't know why they didn't use an internal monitor - this Pt. might have refused it .) HR baselines were between 125 and 115 . Pt reported very painful uc's although monitor did not show strong uc's . 8 pm one dose Stadol . 9 pm physician came in and started iv pit . Pt given 2 or 3 more doses of Stadol between 9 pm and 3 am . Given epidural anesthesia around 3 am . Fell asleep for one hour woke up to enormous pain around pubic bone . Pt was catheterized and checked by nurse who " couldn't find the cervix " . No fetal heart tones. C/S at around 4:25am. Baby was breech . Feet delivered first . I do not know any other details of position . Pt was given 2 units of blood ,baby to nicu and expired a few days later . I don't know what to make of this case .I think we have to vbac those candidates who do not require much intervention yet it's a choice I want women to have . Tonya "Geffrey Klein, MD" wrote:

> At 3:24 PM -0500 on 7/2/00, RModugno@aol.com wrote:
>
> >In a message dated 7/2/00 2:35:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, gklein@icsi.net
> >writes:
> >
> ><< Back to Tonya's case...
> >
> > The doc did not know the baby was breech.
> > Had the doc known the baby was breech, (s)he might have done a cesarean.
> > Had the doc done a cesarean, there would have been no uterine rupture.
> > However, the doc's failure to know the presentation was not the
> > proximate cause of the uterine rupture. (S)he may have very well
> > allowed a trial of labor.
> >
> > If, you were to tell me that the labor was not progressing
> > adequately, that signs of fetal distress were ignored, or that the
> > patient was complaining of characteristic abdominal pain between
> > contractions yet no action was taken, well then, I would agree with
> > you.. >>
> >
> >Then, without all the facts, one cannot make an intelligent comment on the
> >case.
>
> Not true.. I believe Tonya's intent was to present a case that was
> equally as mismanaged as the case I presented. Based on the facts
> that she presented, I have yet to conclude that the doctor committed
> malpractice. My default is not to assume malpractice until given
> the data which leads me to conclude it.. What is your default?
>
> --
> _______________________
> Geffrey H. Klein, MD
> _______________________
> geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
> 200 Medical Center Blvd Suite 103
> Webster, TX 77598
> (281) 332 6723
>
> http://www.geffreyklein.com





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:44:54 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.