-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: AFI in Twins From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Mon May 8 10:17:14 2000 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: charlie chambers: "Re: AFI in Twins" Previous message: Carolyn: "Prolonged Period" In reply to: Garry Siegel: "Re: Twin A Breech" Next in thread: charlie chambers: "Re: AFI in Twins" Reply: charlie chambers: "Re: AFI in Twins" my sentiments exactly! additionally, it appears that AFI has been used in malpractice cases, implying that to not use AFI somehow constitutes a departure. this semi-quantitative index has somehow now been elevated to a status which it quite frankly has not earned. sorry, this had to be said. Art At Fri, 05 May 2000, Ronnie Martinez Brignardello wrote: > >what´s the idea? >....what about subjetive measurement only?? >ronnie > >Luis Sanchez-Ramos wrote: > >> At Thu, 4 May 2000, ATB28@aol.com wrote: >> > >> >Did you see the article in this month's gray journal on this?< >> >> Yes, that is precisely why I'm asking the question. How many perform >> AFIs of each sac vs "summated" AFIs vs individual measurements of >> maximum vertical pocket for each sac etc. >> >> LSR -- art fougner, md A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote. Next message: charlie chambers: "Re: AFI in Twins" Previous message: Carolyn: "Prolonged Period" In reply to: Garry Siegel: "Re: Twin A Breech" Next in thread: charlie chambers: "Re: AFI in Twins" Reply: charlie chambers: "Re: AFI in Twins"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:44:21 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.