Re: IUFD

From: Dean Huffman (jth@springnet1.com)
Sun Apr 30 11:08:18 2000


Do not forget that in American "justice", the concepts "should" and "are" often have no relationship to each other.

-- "This is a court of law, young man, not a court of justice." Oliver Windell Holmes, Jr.

- - - -

At Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Steve & Eryl Raymond wrote: >
>On 26 Apr 2000, at 8:37, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote:
>
>> Just to play the devil's advocate, suppose an OB or FP agreed to do the NST.
>> Significant late decelerations are noted; emergent c-section is performed
>> and a significantly injured baby is born (say with CP.)
>>
>> Who becomes the responsible party? Who is going to get sued?
>
>Why should anyone get sued? Who has been negligent or been
>responsible for this? It seems to me that the original practitioner
>(?CNM) who failed to arrange for ongoing antenatal care is the
>responsible one. Everyone else would have done only what they
>could under the circumstances. The responsible parties include
>the patient for opting for an antenatal "carer" who didn't have
>access to all the tools that she needs to do her job - and the lay
>midwife who didn't have a plan of action of how to deal with the
>need for a NST.
>
>Steve Raymond





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:44:09 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.