-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Gail Model 1.9 From: Karen Lee (karenlee@sos.net) Sat Apr 29 11:52:48 2000 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Gail Model 7.4 / 47.5" Previous message: Steve & Eryl Raymond: "Re: external cephalic version" In reply to: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: Gail Model 1.9" Next in thread: Dean Huffman: "Re: IUFD" Dr Bulley, I have posted a message re a pt of mine which nobody has responded to. It's titled Gail Model 7.4/47.5. I have reworked the numbers and this is accurate. I am chagrined that nobody is responding. Would you be so kind as to read my post and give me some advice? Thank you. -- Karen Lee, ARNP >I find that the women who are totally petrified of Breast Cancer want >ANYTHING with any degree of helpfulness to reduce their risk. These >will consider taking 5 years of Tamoxifen and perhaps follow through >with the 5 year commitment. The women who want to do anything possible >to reduce ASCD, stroke, fractures and Alzheimers - take the breast >cancer risk of our longevity in stride and want to not take 5 years of >Tamoxifen - or if after menopause want to take their HRT. > >So - there is not ONE answer as we do not have the full EBM - scientific >answer. Next message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Gail Model 7.4 / 47.5" Previous message: Steve & Eryl Raymond: "Re: external cephalic version" In reply to: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: Gail Model 1.9" Next in thread: Dean Huffman: "Re: IUFD"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:44:09 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.