|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: IUFDFrom: croure@ibm.netFri Apr 28 19:04:03 2000
At Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote: > >While that clarifies some of the inconsistencies in this case, why wasn't >the involvement issue with the FP evaluated fully at 30 or even 40 weeks? Or >at the latest 41+0. It still seems the responsibility of the midwife (oh no, not enough money) was to >make sure she had adequate back-up. > >As for the impending lawsuit (whether valid or frivolous) it will occur >since rarely do patients take responsibility for their own actions, Trying to shake off the responsibility off mom's shoulders for the death of her own child might be as important if not more than money and >since God cannot be held responsible for His actions (read: no money!!!!), that leaves the care-givers (but not the lay midwife, it must be somebody with deep pockets, something nice like an ob, maybe a FP and certainly a hospital) Now the case >reverts to the basic elementary school game of tag, money makes the world go round....... In Latin : Tagus, urus itum (ahhh, it has been one of those >days :-) ) > >Rick ........ and Carlos
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:33:06 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.