|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: IUFDFrom: Steve & Eryl Raymond (eryl@intekom.co.za)Fri Apr 28 00:46:32 2000
On 26 Apr 2000, at 8:37, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote:
> Just to play the devil's advocate, suppose an OB or FP agreed to do the NST. Why should anyone get sued? Who has been negligent or been responsible for this? It seems to me that the original practitioner (?CNM) who failed to arrange for ongoing antenatal care is the responsible one. Everyone else would have done only what they could under the circumstances. The responsible parties include the patient for opting for an antenatal "carer" who didn't have access to all the tools that she needs to do her job - and the lay midwife who didn't have a plan of action of how to deal with the need for a NST. Steve Raymond
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:33:06 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.