|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Gyn: Gail Model 1.9From: james Connerth (babydoc@apex.net)Wed Apr 26 16:09:44 2000
At Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Efrain Ramirez wrote: > >55 year old female patient, on Prempro 2.5 x 5-6 years, excellent >results; good lubrication, no symptoms, Bones Densitometry Ok, lipid >profile Ok, Gail Model,1.9 (no mistake on that) Yearly mammograms ok, >endometrial stripe ok. >What next? >Just a passing thought--The Gail model has/is being discussed as "standard of care" at recent Breast ca symposium in Miami--If we fail to discuss this with pt.'s and they return 5 yrs later with breast ca-may be liable for not informing them of Rx that "could" reduce risk of breast ca by "40-75%"--- > >-- >"The things you learn after you know everything are the important ones" >
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:44:08 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.