|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Cervical erosionFrom: Braun, R. Daniel (rbraun@iupui.edu)Tue Apr 25 08:26:38 2000
Based on Data or Personal Revelation??????? Dan R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG Clinical Professor Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Indiana U. School of Medicine Indianapolis, IN 46202 OBGYN.net International Representative for United States Certified AllExperts Expert Check out my bio/ratings page! http://www.allexperts.com/displayExpert.asp?Expert=1236 -----Original Message----- From: Ealgail@aol.com [mailto:Ealgail@aol.com] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 11:17 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Cervical erosion In a message dated 4/20/00 4:59:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time, rbraun@iupui.edu writes: << women treated in this way did not develop squamous cell CA of the cervix. >> On the contrary, our gyn oncologist from Sloan Kettering taught that the scarring following electrocautery could conceal a dysplasia or frankly SCC of the cervix by yielding normal pap smears. He was very much against it. Linda Linda Morrison-Boczar, M.D. FACOG
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:44:08 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.