|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Cervical erosionFrom: John Robertson MD (john.robertson@obgyn.net)Thu Apr 20 21:22:36 2000
At Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Garry Siegel wrote: snip > >I also have the sense that cryos fail more, especially with high grade >lesions. I also have the sense that recurrences after cryo are more >worrisome. Any thoughts? > >Garry > only study I know of compared cryo with laser. They were equivalent except for LARGE lesions (laser was better for these). There was no difference with respect to grade of lesion. John.
-- J.G.M.Robertson MD, 109-9181 Main St. Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 4M9 (604) 793-9988 e-mail john.robertson@obgyn.net Who is wise and understanding among you? Let him show it by his good life, by deeds done in the humility that comes from wisdom. James 3 vs 13, NIV
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:44:08 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.