-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: 2nd trimester losses From: DoctorJoe@aol.com Sun Apr 16 18:49:41 2000 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Larry Glazerman: "Re: 2nd trimester losses" Previous message: Larry Glazerman: "Re: Clasical C/S" Next in thread: Larry Glazerman: "Re: 2nd trimester losses" Reply: Larry Glazerman: "Re: 2nd trimester losses" In a message dated 4/16/00 4:13:48 PM, l.glazerman@rcn.com writes: >The MFM guys at my hospital just presented a paper at SPO looking at >cerclage vs no cerclage in the funneling situation. They randomized, and > >found no difference in outcomes, unfortunately. > >As much as I'd agree that I'd like to do something, I'm not sure cerclage > >will make a difference. I think I read that one... but I don't have it handy. What kind of cerclage did they do, McDonald or Shirdkar? Joe P. Next message: Larry Glazerman: "Re: 2nd trimester losses" Previous message: Larry Glazerman: "Re: Clasical C/S" Next in thread: Larry Glazerman: "Re: 2nd trimester losses" Reply: Larry Glazerman: "Re: 2nd trimester losses"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 04:46:17 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.