|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Classical C/S - Dr SiegelFrom: Eberhard W Lisse (el@ac.lisse.na)Sun Apr 9 12:51:37 2000
In message <200004082146.QAA25736@forum.obgyn.net>, Garry Siegel writes: > El: > > Respectfully, I don't think that making a midline or larger incision in > order to facilitate surgery is a legitimate malpractice issue. In the context I would say, a skin incision, yes. But the way you presented the case in your second posting ("Why bother?"), CLEARLY not.
> While others may disagree with that which I did, and we all enjoy Well, that depends on the outcome and whether she is happy with it. But what would happen if the uterus became septic, needed to be removed, and she sued alleging that the large incision into the usterus caused that. He laywer will then ask you why you made a classical incision (never mind whether you are experienced in this particular procedure) and you reply: "Why struggle if it is not necessary??" el
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:44:07 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.