![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
FW: Wired News : Hope for Spina Bifida BabiesFrom: Jeffrey W. Clemens (clemens@duq.edu)Tue Mar 28 14:28:31 2000
FYI Spina bifida and open fetal surgery. Jeff -- Jeffrey W. Clemens, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Biological Sciences Duquesne University Pittsburgh, PA 15282 412-396-4597 fax-5907 http://www.home.cc.duq.edu/~clemens/ ---------- >... > Subject: Wired News : Hope for Spina Bifida Babies > From Wired News, available online at: > http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,34811,00.html > > Hope for Spina Bifida Babies > by Lynn Burke > 3:00 a.m. Mar. 28, 2000 PST > Joyce Garcia cried when she heard her unborn son had spina bifida. > When her doctor told her she could either abort the pregnancy or give > birth to a permanently disabled baby, she cried even harder. > But later that day her husband found something on the Internet that > would dramatically alter the course of their lives. ... > It was a website for open fetal surgery, a controversial procedure > that is only performed by a handful of doctors and exactly three > hospitals in the world. > Even after the Garcias met with the doctors behind the website, who > explained that they would make an incision in Joyce's stomach, remove > her uterus and place it on her torso, and then operate on the tiny > lesion that had formed on her unborn baby's spine, the couple was > still interested. > And so, in a matter of weeks, Joyce Garcia became the third pregnant > woman in the world to have the delicate, risky procedure performed. > Experts are hesitant to call it an Internet success story, even though > baby Nicholas is now an active toddler who shows signs of developing > far better than most spina bifida babies. > Dr. Leslie Sutton, who performs open fetal surgery as chief of > neurosurgery at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, said information > on the Internet might mislead parents about what is ultimately a > complicated and unproven procedure. > "The Internet is totally unpoliced, and is often used more as a > marketing tool for doctors and hospitals than a pure scientific > source," Sutton said, adding that the "we perform miracles" tone of > some sites is inappropriate. > "We as scientists have to be appropriately skeptical. We have to not > be so wildly enthusiastic as to not look at this in a scientific > fashion," he said. > One out of every 1,000 newborns in the United States -- about 2,000 > infants annually -- is afflicted with the disabling birth defect each > year, according to the Spina Bifida Association of America. > The neurological condition occurs when a fetus' spine doesn't develop > properly and leaves the spinal cord exposed and vulnerable to injury > in the womb. > If a lesion forms on the cord, fluid leaks out through the opening and > is unable to circulate properly in the fetus' brain, resulting in > hydrocephalus, which may cause brain damage. Many spina bifida babies > suffer varying degrees of paralysis, learning disabilities, and > impaired bowel control. > The surgery, introduced for non-fatal conditions in 1997, does not > have wide acceptance in the medical community, and doesn't even > mention the treatment option on its website. > Sutton, although optimistic about the procedure, says patients should > be informed about the fetal surgery option by their doctors, not by > websites. > But when Maryann Dotegowski, 41, found out that she was carrying a > spina bifida baby, she said she was only presented by doctors with the > abort-or-proceed option. > Like the Garcia family and many others, she found out about a third > option on a website. A few weeks later, Dotegowski flew from her home > in Deptford, New Jersey to Vanderbilt University Medical Center in > Nashville, Tennessee, and had the operation. Two months later, she > delivered Emily Grace. > The baby, now 16 months old, is doing well. "She [just] took > her first step," her mother said. "It was with help, but it was her > first step." > Dotegowski believes her daughter would have been paralyzed from the > waist down without the surgery. > Critics of the procedure say it's way too soon to tell whether Emily > Dotegowski and Nicolas Garcia and the estimated 100 other open fetal > surgery babies are any better off from the procedure. > Joe Leigh Simpson, an obstetrician with the Department of Obstetrics > and Gynecology at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said > open-fetal surgery is risky, and often leads to pregnancy > complications including premature births. > He wrote an editorial in the Journal of the American Medical > Association warning against unabashed enthusiasm for the procedure. > "For in utero myelomeninggocele [spina bifida] repair to > become widely recommended, clear demonstration of greater success in > fetal outcome and fewer obstetrical complications are necessary," he > wrote. "This could well happen, but until then the surgery remains > unproved." > But Joseph Bruner, the director of fetal diagnosis and therapy at > Vanderbilt who owns and operates a website called fetalsurgeons.com, > counters that as long as doctors are remaining tight-lipped with their > patients, the Internet is the perfect place to disseminate information > about the procedure. > "We're basically serving a huge catchment area, the entire country. > The only way to communicate with these patients is on the Internet," > he said. "Our work is about increasing options for women who are faced > with terrible news. > "Within the medical community there are skeptics, as there are with > all new procedures," Bruner added. > And although hard proof of the treatment's efficacy is probably > several years down the road, preliminary research from Children's > Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania showed > that surgery performed on 10 fetuses with spina bifida lesions led to > a significant decrease in hindbrain herniation, the leading cause of > death in spina bifida babies.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:43:51 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.