-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: questions From: Bernard Cristalli (bcrist@club-internet.fr) Sat Feb 26 13:35:34 2000 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: bad glad???" Previous message: Ronnie Martinez Brignardello: "Re: bad glad???" In reply to: charlie chambers: "questions" Next in thread: Zach Newton: "Re: questions" 1. the fibroids are still there, tiny but there. After an endometrial ablation the recurrence rate is higher than without any Gn-RH treatment (Fedele L & al. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 393-6) 2. the only treatment in these women is total hysterectomy. -- Bernard Cristalli MD AMACOG AIHP - ACCA Paris France Bernard.Cristalli@CliniquedelEssonne.fr http://www.CliniquedelEssonne.fr http://www.obgyn.net/corresp/cristalli.htm '64 Mk2 3.8 > De : cchamber@mnic.net Sat Feb 26 17:26:29 2000 > Répondre à : ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net > Date : Sat, 26 Feb 2000 10:24:12 -0600 > À : Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@forum.obgyn.net> > Objet : questions > > two questions for the group: > > 1. after preoperative treatment of a patient with a GnRH agonist for 2 > months for leiomyoma, is it possible to not have pathologic evidence of > leiomyoma in the hysterectomy specimen? > > 2. any suggested explanations for patient with significantly profuse > transcervical watery discharge? tubes and ovaries normal at surgery. only > preoperative findings, large white area to anterior fundus, but > nonpathologic. Significant pelvic adhesive disease suggesting prior PID. > Findings not consistent with any fistula. Discharge approximantely 100 cc at > time of exam. > -- > ############################################################################ > > Charlie Chambers, MD "No matter where you go... > 1765 Denmark Pl there you are." > Owatonna, MN 55060 > (507)444-9716 Dr. Buckaroo Banzai > cchamber@alumni.rice.edu > > ############################################################################ > Next message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: bad glad???" Previous message: Ronnie Martinez Brignardello: "Re: bad glad???" In reply to: charlie chambers: "questions" Next in thread: Zach Newton: "Re: questions"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:43:44 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.