How to get a baby on time (long)

From: RModugno@aol.com
Sat Feb 26 08:45:15 2000


This is what Cochrane has to say about stripping membranes:

Stripping/sweeping the membranes for inducing labour or preventing post-term pregnancy

Boulvain M, Irion O

ABSTRACT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A substantive amendment to this systematic review was last made on 12 May 1998. Cochrane reviews are regularly checked and updated if necessary. Background: Stripping or sweeping of the membranes aims to initiate labour through a cascade of physiological events. These may reduce pregnancy duration or pre-empt formal induction of labour with either oxytocin, prostaglandins or amniotomy.

Objectives: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of membrane sweeping to promote or induce labour on maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (last searched April 1998).

Selection criteria: Adequately controlled trials of digital separation of the membranes from the lower uterine segment for inducing labour or for preventing post-term pregnancy, compared to either no vaginal examination or vaginal examination for cervical assessment only without the intention to detach the membranes.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data.

Main results: Fourteen trials were included. Sweeping of the membranes, performed as a general policy in women at term, was associated with reduced duration of pregnancy and the frequency of pregnancy continuing beyond 41 weeks (relative risk 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 0.93, random effects model) and 42 weeks. After sweeping of the membranes, there was a 17% risk reduction (confidence interval 6 to 29%, random effects model) in the use of more formal methods for labour induction. There was no difference in the mode of delivery or in the risk of infection. Discomfort during vaginal examination and other adverse effects (bleeding, irregular contractions) were more frequently reported by women allocated to sweeping.

Reviewers' conclusions: Routine use of sweeping of membranes from 38 weeks of pregnancy onwards does not seem to produce clinically important benefits. When used as a means for induction of labour, the reduction in the use of more formal methods of induction needs to be balanced against women's discomfort and other adverse effects.

Citation: Boulvain M, Irion O. Stripping/sweeping the membranes for inducing labour or preventing post-term pregnancy (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marietta, GA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:43:44 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.