Re: FW: Wired News : FDA Panel Backs Fetal Monitor

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Wed Jan 26 12:25:07 2000


IMHO once again, this technology will do little to influence ultimate neonatal outcome nor significantly influence Cesarean rates. Lawsuits, however, well ... Stay tuned!

Art

At Wed, 26 Jan 2000, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: >
>In a message dated 1/26/0 6:34:34 AM, you wrote:
>
><<I thought this might be of interest to many of you out there. It is
>
>basically a fetal pulse oximeter. We recently had Frank Boehm from
>
>Vanderbilt as a visiting Professor and he said he thought that this was
>
>great.>>
>
>Wasn't something like this recently reported in the green journal (Obstet
>Gynecol)? I thought its use decreased the rate of C/S for "nonreassuring
>fetal status" compared to the control group, but somehow the rate of C/S for
>dystocia increased, so the overall C/S rate between the groups was identical.
>So it would seem that we have a new entity, "fetal electrode dystocia,"
>dystocia caused by so many damned electrodes on the baby's head that he won't
>come out.
>
>Joe P.

--
art fougner, md

and what am i gonna do with all this food, bottled water, and gasoline now that armageddon was called off for lack of interest?





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 04:43:29 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.