![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Interventiobns, inductions, cytotec-->Uterine Rupture, More High Risk Patients
From: Carolyn Rafferty (CRafferty@anacs.org)
Thu, 9 May 2002 11:20:06 -0500 (CDT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Christy Ann Flynn, RN: "Post C/S assessments"
- Previous message: Claudia Twisdale RN: "Re: keeping track of rh negative obstetric patients"
- Next in thread: mark kimble RN BSN: "Re: Interventiobns, inductions, cytotec-->Uterine Rupture, More High Risk Patients"
- Reply: mark kimble RN BSN: "Re: Interventiobns, inductions, cytotec-->Uterine Rupture, More High Risk Patients"
I was just wondering if any of you are seeing the trend of more intervention in lowrisk birth and if you are willing to talk about what all the interventions do to normal birth? I work in a community hospital have a background as a doula and childbirth advocate. I know that many times women need interventions and that some save lives of babies and moms but don't many just occur out of convenience to MD's, staffing, and moms? I am worried about the medicalization of the birth process. I wonder if any of you are. I see so many women come in long, thick, and closed for inductions at 38-40 wks and they end up with cesareans. I had a conversation with an MD a few days ago and he said he felt cesareans were safer than vaginal delivery and offered women better outcomes! Does this type of thinking outrage any of you? Please talk to me. I am looking for other nurses that would like to see us keep our interventions to ourselves as long as everything is OK. Do any of you keep current on the trends in the natural childbirth arena..do all of you feel women should get early epidurals. Do any of you feel badly when you know your patient doesn't have all the information necesarry to make an informed choice? Are there issues in maternity nursing you think should be brought to the forefront and openly discussed? Please contact me. Or visit http://www.ANACS.org We are a group of nurses that really believes birth can work..all by itself..and that women deserve more than they are currently getting from traditional obstetrical care.Thanks for reading..if I offended you..or made you think...I really want to know it. Email me at Crafferty@anacs.org Regards, Carolyn Rafferty, RN, BSN Executive Director, ANACS, Inc.
- Next message: Christy Ann Flynn, RN: "Post C/S assessments"
- Previous message: Claudia Twisdale RN: "Re: keeping track of rh negative obstetric patients"
- Next in thread: mark kimble RN BSN: "Re: Interventiobns, inductions, cytotec-->Uterine Rupture, More High Risk Patients"
- Reply: mark kimble RN BSN: "Re: Interventiobns, inductions, cytotec-->Uterine Rupture, More High Risk Patients"
use when must restrict search to only the nursing forum...
Return to ![]()
Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 17:09:14 2008
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote
home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international
e-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer |
This information is provided for educational purposes only.
Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com