![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: cervical cancer follow upFrom: Karen (anonymous@obgyn.net)Thu, 27 Mar 1997 16:36:09 -0600 (CST)
At Wed, 26 Mar 1997, Douglas wrote: > >At Mon, 24 Mar 1997, Karen wrote: >> >>I have a 24 yr old student who just had surgery for cervical cancer 2 >>wks ago by an ob/gyn. > >Karen, > >Wow! There is a lot of misconception out there about this kind of >surgery! Your student did NOT have cancer. She had a pre-cancerous >lesion; one which COULD have become cancer under certain circumstances, >but was likely NOT CANCER. The treatment for cervical CANCER is RADICAL >surgery or radiation. These precancerous conditions are called by a >variety of names: Dysplasia and Carcinoma-in-situ are two commonly used >terms. > >The usual care for patients who have undergone this kind of therapy is >simple. Nothing in the vagina for 2-4 weeks. Report any fever, pain, >or persistant bleeding or discharge. >Follow up PAP smear in 4-6 months and use condoms til then. > >-- >Douglas Krell MD FACOG > I do not know where you are located, so unless you did the pathology on my student, how do you know she did not have cancer? She told me they did a pap, then did a biopsy and it WAS cancer. She had not had a pap done in 6 years, so they told her it was fairly bad. Then they did surgery. I didn't probe her for specifics on exactly what they did in this surgery so I do not know exactly how 'radical' it was. I appreciate your response, especially since you're the only one to respond, but I do not appreciate you calling us a liar when she had the path report to prove it.
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 07:04:53 2009
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote
home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international