Re: ULTRASOUND digest 34

From: evsono@pop.pipeline.com
Tue Dec 23 06:42:37 1997


wow i can't blieve this - this list is brand new and already a flame war! let's cut it out and resume discussing how we can develop our skills. don't you folks think this would be a more profitable endeavor?

merry christmas.

art fougner md evsono@pipeline.com

At 07:12 PM 12/22/97 -0600, you wrote: > ULTRASOUND Digest 34
>
>Topics covered in this issue include:
>
> 1) Re: doctors and us
> by KMatzke107 <KMatzke107@aol.com>
> 2) Re: doctors and us
> by tjdubose@juno.com (Terry J. DuBose)
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 23:13:09 EST
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>From: KMatzke107 <KMatzke107@aol.com>
>To: ultrasound@obgyn.net
>Cc: sonographers-connection@lists.uchsc.edu
>Subject: Re: doctors and us
>Message-ID: <b4554407.349de8d8@aol.com>
>
>Dear Ellison,
>Dear Frank,
>
>I would like to correct Ellison in that she told you to keep up the good work.
>We only have your word that you do good work. I would correct it to hopefully
>keeep up the good work. I have known many Doctors who claim to do good work
>until a qualified sonographer observes them work or we would review their
>films and studies.
>
>Pardon me if I seem overly critical. The problem I have is that a practicing
>physician could not get the experience of a full time sonographer who does
>nothing but technical component of ultrasound.
>I have worked with physicians who have done fellowships in sonography and
>can't do the technical work of the "qualified" sonographers who I work with.
>Ultrasound is a technically dependent field and the more cases you do the
>better you get.
>
>A couple of questions Frank. Would you let a cardiologist do your
>cholecystectomy? Would you let a radiologist deliver your baby? Well I would
>not let a physician do my ultrasound. One such fertility specialist did an
>ultrasound on my wife. After I repeated the ultrasound the surgeon had to
>alter the approach to my wifes surgery the night before she had it. Guess who
>made the correct diagnosis. It wasn't the doc.
>
>One more question Frank. You never did say which equipment you recommended
>or bought for yourself.
>
>Dave.
>
>------------------------------
>
>------------------------------
>Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 08:19:18 -0600
>------------------------------
>From: tjdubose@juno.com (Terry J. DuBose)
>To: ultrasound@obgyn.net
>Cc: ultrasound@talk.obgyn.net
>Subject: Re: doctors and us
>Message-ID: <19971222.081920.11510.5.tjdubose@juno.com>
>
>Dave, are you saying that just because a person is a physician that it is
>impossible for them to be good at sonography? Your message sounds like
>that. You are painting with a rather too broad a brush. That is a bit
>over the line. I know some very good sonologists.
>
>Ellison's comment was that there are both physicians and non-physicians
>who are good at sonography as well as those who are not so good.
>(Ellison, by the way is not a she, not that it makes any real
>difference.)
>
>I hope we can keep the topic on OBGYN Sonography. I realize that legal
>and socioeconomic issues are often a part of that I think we do not need
>prejudicial, inflammatory personal attacks. Let's first assume that we
>are all here in the interest of good sonography and women's health,
>either with experience or those wanting to gain experience, but all
>wanting to learn.
>
>Obviously you have had some bad experiences, but please do not judge all
>people by those you may have worked with.
>
>Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS
>Chair, Ultrasound@OBGYN.net
>
>On Sun, 21 Dec 1997 22:36:24 -0600 KMatzke107 <KMatzke107@aol.com>
>writes:
>>Dear Ellison,
>>Dear Frank,
>>
>>I would like to correct Ellison in that she told you to keep up the
>>good work.
><snip>.
>>I have known many Doctors who claim to do good work
>>until a qualified sonographer observes them work or
>> we would review their films and studies.
>>
>>Pardon me if I seem overly critical. The problem I have is that a
>>practicing physician could not get the experience of a full time
>>sonographer who does nothing but technical
>>component of ultrasound.
>>I have worked with physicians who have done
>>fellowships in sonography and
>>can't do the technical work of the "qualified"
>>sonographers who I work with.
><snip>
>>Dave.
>>
>
>------------------------------
>
>------------------------------
>End of ULTRASOUND Digest 34
>------------------------------
>***************************
>




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:38:25 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.