|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
FW: HCFA MeetingFrom: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@exchange.uams.edu)Fri Dec 19 12:38:05 1997
Received: from m12.boston.juno.com (m12.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.194]) by talk.obgyn.net (8.8.7/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA09323 for <ultrasound@talk.obgyn.net>; Fri, 19 Dec 1997 13:37:52 -0600 Received: (from lawson98@juno.com) by m12.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id OxN24624; Fri, 19 Dec 1997 14:48:49 EST To: Sonographers-Connection-Digest@Lists.UCHSC.edu Cc: ultrasound@talk.obgyn.net Subject: Lawson: ectopics and HCG levels Message-ID: <19971219.135139.10367.2.Lawson98@juno.com> References: <1.5.4.32.19971219022312.006f090c@redrose.net> X-Mailer: Juno 1.38 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-1,3-5,11-12,16-18 From: lawson98@juno.com (MARK LAWSON) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 14:48:49 EST
buddy@redrose.net writes:
>With an HCG of 62,000 not only should an embryo be visualized but Dearheart Janet.... I got two cases 7-8k levels and no heartbeat.... negative adnexa, small fundal fluid collections ??dicidual ring........so now what.... Lab says .... U/S should see the cardiac activity, if not they must be off... we say we just calls them as we sees them, thank you for the slam, you must be all knowing and right.....(not my words exactly:-)).... rising levels no cardiac activity....must be ectopic.... not exactly In these two cases twin IUP's were discovered subsequently.... We fought hard the methyltrexate route and won.... Some kids will never know how close they were ;-) My belief was that the twins register higher levels earlier.... anyone got a spin on this????
-- Mark Lawson -- Texas
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:38:25 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.