ULTRASOUND Messages for December, 1997: Re: amniotic bands

Re: amniotic bands
From: Terry J. DuBose (tjdubose@juno.com)
Sun Dec 7 19:38:53 1997

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Terry J. DuBose: "Re: Cervical Length"
Previous message: marlene dugas: "Re: subscription"

Terry J. DuBose, Little Rock, AR, USA
Suzy, et al. I think the current consensus is that these were not amniontic bands, but uterine synechia which should have a better prognosis. You can look at the images on the http://wwweb site at: http://www.obgyn.net/US/us_images.htm
Peace, Terry J. DuBose >Dear Dr.Mamula,
>I would think that the incidence of anomalies
> would be much higher in a monochorionic
>pregnancy rather than a dichorionic pregnancy.
>I have seen complete lower limb amputations
>with amniotic bands, but I have also seen
>perfectly normal outcomes with this phenomenon.
>Does anyone else with more
>experience have any thoughts on this
>question? Suzy
>

Next message: Terry J. DuBose: "Re: Cervical Length"
Previous message: marlene dugas: "Re: subscription"

Return to Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:34:05 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
	Returns per screen: Require all keywords: