|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: midwivesFrom: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@exchange.uams.edu)Mon Dec 1 01:21:56 1997
Thanks, Diana. I have subscribed to the MidWives list for about 3 years now. It does have some lively discussions, actually it has more traffic than the Sonographers two lists put together. Almost as much as the OBGYN-l. They take their work very seriously, even if some of them are not quite into mainstream medicine. I find their discussions generally enlightening (and often delightfully amusing, like a thread a couple of years ago about wearing Berkinstocks;-), and have found them very open to sonographers' for input. Diana, I hope you don't mind my sharing your comments with them, especially since they are not inflammatory. Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS; Assistant Professor
>From: DRoss38040@aol.com [SMTP:DRoss38040@aol.com]
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:38:25 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.