|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FW: NM Sonography Licensure Bill Signed into LawFrom: Ross, Diana (Diana.Ross@va.gov)Mon Apr 13 08:19:44 2009
I would like to remind people that there will certainly be "grandfathering" of techs who have been out there a certain number of years, as there always is with these bills. At least I hope so. I hope New Mexico wouldn't throw out the baby with the bath water.... We definitely need regulation.... Diana -----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Audrey Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 6:51 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: FW: NM Sonography Licensure Bill Signed into Law This can only be a good thing. I have heard some people get upset about this. Their attitude seems to be: How dare ANYONE require that I actually be regulated to perform this intricate and difficult exam! I've been doing this X years and that is just good enough. Who needs education? A degree doesn't make me scan better. Who needs lab accreditation? Being credentialed doesn't make me Scan better. Who needs anyone saying anything about anyone? Pooh, we don't need no stinking oversight! I just laugh because to me it shows the limitations in thinking. When we limit ourselves we deny ourselves the ability to advance and provide choices for our future. Instead of flying, we'll be stuck toadding along in the dark. Unfortunately because sonographers have failed to demand national education and credentialing requiremenets we have abdicated the responsibility to others. We have no one to blame but ourselves. I feel that if we, as sonographers, don't start stepping up to the plate and regulating ourselves to a high standard, 4 year education and credentialing, we will stay right where we are. The Advance Practice Sonographer is still a bit of a joke, in my opinion. The same discussions are being held today as they were 10-15 years ago. Nothing much new or different there. Why? Because many experienced sonographers refuse to admit that a bachelor degree is important for recognition in the greater world. People seem to be looking out for themselves only and not the future profession. There comes a time when either you must change or the world will change without you. Be part of the solution or part of the problem. If you don't want to work for change, or actively work against the change, then get out of the way and let people who will get on with the work. At least the SDMS saw that they MUST change their official stance or once again be left behind in the process. Audrey Fleming BHSc, RT (R), RDMS, RVS
"DuBose, Terry" <DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu> 04/07 6:28 AM wrote:
>
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:37:50 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.