Re: Regarding Renal Pelvis Dilation

From: James Smeltzer (James.Smeltzer@wellstar.org)
Tue Nov 25 01:27:04 2008


This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to properly handle MIME multipart messages.

--=__Part1A3275A6.1__ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This dilation is typed as mild. Jane Courteville in the most careful followup study to date found that about a third required follow up after birth, and in a third of these enough was wrong to require surgery. Almost all these babies do well. One in ten or so needs intervention to have a normal chance. Jim

>>> On 11/24/2008 at 11:32 AM, in message
<BLU102-W4228FF3759C51802CD3BB6D3080@phx.gbl>, Saul Huizil Martinez <huitzilmtz@hotmail.com> wrote: is not decisive

> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:53:42 -0600
> From: sharda.saurabh@gmail.com
> To: ultrasound@mail.obgyn.net
> Subject: Regarding Renal Pelvis Dilation
>
> Dear Sir,
> This is with respect to one discussion i saw on your board
(obgyn.net) > regarding renal pelvis dilation.
> Our baby had a normal second level sonography. At 26 weeks we had
> another sonography for fetal echo. There the Sonographer said that
> there is a mild Renal Pelvis Dilation of 8 mm and a follow-up
> sonography will be required. At 32 weeks we went for Level-III
> sonography, which concluded that the RPD has increased to 12 mm.
> Our doctor said that its unilateral and not much to worry about she
> suggested one more sonography at week 34. And the baby may have to
go > through a sonography two weeks after birth.
> Kindly tell us if its a cause of real concern. And whether something
> can be done so that we can have a healthy baby.
>
> Thanking you in anticipation.
>
> saurabh sharda

¿Tus fotos son un desorden? La solución a tus males se llama Galería fotográfica de Windows Live ( http://get.live.com )

________________________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it may contain

--
________________________________________________
confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession
of WellStar Health System, Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended
only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email
may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution
or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited,
and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email
and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer.
- Thank you.

--=__Part1A3275A6.1__ Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: HTML

This dilation is typed as mild. Jane Courteville in the most careful followup study to date found that about a third required follow up after birth, and in a third of these enough was wrong to require surgery. Almost all these babies do well. One in ten or so needs intervention to have a normal chance. Jim

>>> On 11/24/2008 at 11:32 AM, in message <BLU102-W4228FF3759C51802CD3BB6D3080@phx.gbl>, Saul Huizil Martinez <huitzilmtz@hotmail.com> wrote:

is not decisive

> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:53:42 -0600
> From: sharda.saurabh@gmail.com
> To: ultrasound@mail.obgyn.net
> Subject: Regarding Renal Pelvis Dilation
>
> Dear Sir,
> This is with respect to one discussion i saw on your board (obgyn.net)
> regarding renal pelvis dilation.
> Our baby had a normal second level sonography. At 26 weeks we had
> another sonography for fetal echo. There the Sonographer said that
> there is a mild Renal Pelvis Dilation of 8 mm and a follow-up
> sonography will be required. At 32 weeks we went for Level-III
> sonography, which concluded that the RPD has increased to 12 mm.
> Our doctor said that its unilateral and not much to worry about she
> suggested one more sonography at week 34. And the baby may have to go
> through a sonography two weeks after birth.
> Kindly tell us if its a cause of real concern. And whether something
> can be done so that we can have a healthy baby.
>
> Thanking you in anticipation.
>
> saurabh sharda


¿Tus fotos son un desorden? La solución a tus males se llama Galería fotográfica de Windows Live

____________________________________________________________  ____________________________________________________________ 
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. - Thank you.



recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:37:40 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.