Re: Anomaly scan, Serum testing, Down Syndrome

From: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu)
Mon Jul 14 11:46:54 2008


Well... depends on the author. Callen's new textbook (5th edition) shows the BPD to be from 20 to 23 mm during the 13th week (13.2-13.8 weeks). My own measurements show the BPD to be 23 mm at 13 weeks, based upon several thousands of cases. We really don't have any precise measurements, and many refer to any fetus between 13.0 and 13.9 weeks, "as 13 weeks". This is the reason I have always advocated estimating fetal age to the 1/10 of a week, rather than just weeks or even weeks + days... it is easier to average the multiple fetal parameter ages after Hadlock's method.

This really does not tell us the precise measurement, "I have a 33yr old gravida2, with 13 weeks pregnancy, scan done today shows mild ventriculomegaly...."

It may be that because at 13 weeks the choroid plexus and lateral ventricles appear to fill the cerebral hemispheres that the "mild ventriculomegaly" call was made. Without measurements we can't argue the point.

But I do believe that by the start of the 1st trimester, the lateral ventricular atria has reached 7-10 mm and remains that size as the head and cerebrum enlarges around them.

Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM

Associate Professor & Director Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563 Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA 501-686-6510 or 501-686-5948 DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu http://www.uams.edu/chrp/sonography/ http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm http://www.io.com/~dubose/ --------------------------------------------------------------- P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail ---------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of James Smeltzer Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 5:44 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Anomaly scan, Serum testing, Down Syndrome andLateralventricles

Just a comment that the normal 13 week BPD is 20. Even though the LVs are close to 10, as every cell in the brain must come from the wall of the tube, and few cells have been made yet, the whole cannot be greater (or less) than the sum of its parts. JSS

>>> "DuBose, Terry" <DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu> 7/11/2008 6:06 PM >>>
Not necessarily for 10 mm... 15 mm is too large at any age. However, at 13 weeks the ventricles fill most of the cranium and appear to be huge compared to the rest of the head. The choroid appears to fill the hemispheres of the cranium at 13 weeks.

I can't find a specific image with measurements at 13 weeks, but in Fetal Sonography, p. 431 there is a sonogram that shows the choroid plexus and lateral ventricles to be at 10 mm in width (the scale is on the image). Also, I found an image of a 13 week fetal head in Callen's latest edition (5th edition, p. 364) that show the structures and describe them as ", the intercrainal anatomy is dominated by the prominent choroid plexuses of the lateral ventricles."

I don't know when the width of the lateral ventricles actually reaches 7-10 mm, but it is during the end of the 1st trimester. The head then grows larger around the ventricles, which make them appear to become smaller, but they remain about <10mm in width throughout the rest of the gestation.

Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM

Associate Professor & Director Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563 Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA 501-686-6510 or 501-686-5948 DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu http://www.uams.edu/chrp/sonography/ http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm http://www.io.com/~dubose/ --------------------------------------------------------------- P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail ---------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message----- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of jworrall@alaska.net Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:52 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Anomaly scan, Serum testing, Down Syndrome and Lateralventricles

Thanks Dr. Smeltzer. Yes, I realize now that an atrium of 10-15 mm at 13 weeks would mean the fetal head had to be enormous.

Allen

>----- Original Message -----
From: "James Smeltzer" <James.Smeltzer@wellstar.org> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@mail.obgyn.net> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:44 AM Subject: Anomaly scan, Serum testing, Down Syndrome and Lateralventricles

> Hi!
>
> All the cells of the CNS are lining cells of the wall of the tube that
> started there, migrated out to their final position and did what they were
> supposed to do, based on where they came from and other factors.
>
>>From a CNS perspective we are all totally tubular!
>
> It only stands to reason that the starting mass of cells outside the tube
> is small, and grows as more join them.
>
> This is the way of the tube.
>
> Allen, 10-15mm seems a bit generous for the LV tube diameter at the atrium
> at 13 weeks, since as the BPD is only 20mm and has to include one side of
> the skull and the entire brain, and the two LVs are at a slightly
> higher - and narrower - level of the brain (but still have SOME brain
> substance at 13 weeks.
>
> A nuchal translucency of 2.6mm at 13 weeks (~CRL 67) is sufficient to
> discuss/offer an amnio or CVS and fetal echo, or serum testing, tqargeted
> sonogram (our preferred route), as the odds ratio for Down Synd is about
> .75/.05. or about 15 fold the baseline age and other screening risk
> (Snijders & al, Lancet 1998; 351:343-6). Yagel & al Ult. (Obstet. Gynecol
> 11:262, 1998) come up with more conservative numbers, and if your normal
> data fit their curve, you are right not to routinely offer an amnio to a
> womal under 31, as their predicted nuchal lucency is 2.6 mm. (Odds ratio
> of ~2 - not sure of their Down results).
>
> I am not recommending everyone rely as heavily on dysmorphology as we do,
> as there is a learning curve, amnio is 100% (99.4%) reliable and we do a
> ridiculously low number of amnios - with a ridiculously high positive
> rate. But looking never killed a baby.
>
> I would definitely look for tricuspid regurgitation, brachycephaly - which
> can be seen early - short femur, and humerus, and an absent nose bone, at
> least. Of course an AV septal defect alone would be sufficient to warrant
> an amniocentesis. Personally, in our hands, serum markers have helped to
> identify Down syndrome only once in the absence of a suggestive sonogram,
> but have - with quad screen - gotten to an acceptably low false positive
> rate, low enough to raise the odds, and significantly increase the
> detection of Down syndrome in the absence of early careful sonography.
>
> Know your results and your normal curve for NL as these are essential for
> interpretation of results. (I still do not understand how we get such
> different normals. Maybe we should all take the same course;^)
>
> Hope this helps! Jim Smeltzer
>
> James S. Smeltzer, MD, FACOG, SMFM
> Consultant, Maternal Fetal Medicine
> Wellstar Physicians' Group
> Northwest Women's Care
> 787 Campbell Hill St
> Marietta GA 30060
> James.Smeltzer@wellstar.org
> VM 678-290-3035
> Off 770-528-0260
> Page 404-318-3451
>
>>>> Terry DuBose <terrydubose@sbcglobal.net> 7/5/2008 2:14 PM >>>
> I think Allen is correct, the ventricles often appear large early on, but
> as the head grows up around them, they tend to look more normal... need
> measurements later. Terry
>
> jworrall@alaska.net wrote: At 13 weeks a transvaginal scan will often
> (but not always) permit a very
> good view of the fetal head. I am not sure what "mild" ventriculomegaly
> is,
> but probably the atrium of the lateral cerebral ventricle measures between
> 10 and 15 mm. If a good view of the fetal head can be obtained, you would
> be
> able to evaluate the posterior cerebral fossa, and look at the posterior
> end
> of the occipital horn (is it rounded or pointed?) the cisterna magna, and
> the cerebellum. Remember that this early in pregnancy the cerebellar
> vermis
> is not completely formed, so as you scan the posterior cerebral fossa
> inferiorly, you may mistakenly think you have a Dandy Walker situation. I
> am not sure you would see the cavum septi pellucidi that early.
>
> Hopefully, in addition to the nuchal translucency, the patient has been
> able
> to obtain the blood test part of that genetic screen, the PAPP-A and beta
> hcg, so that you will get a proper evaluation of her risk of having a baby
> with Trisomy 21. I do NOT think mild ventriculomegaly and a nuchal
> translucency of 2.6 mm would be an indication for amniocentesis or
> chorionic
> villus sampling but I guess that depends on where you practice and what
> the
> custom is in your location. As always, I hope Anita and Prathima will
> comment.
>
> Allen
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "cjayankar" Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 3:16 AMTo: "Multiple
> --------------------------------------------------
> recipients of list ULTRASOUND"
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subject: anomaly scan
>
>> hello
>>
>> I have a 33yr old gravida2,with 13 weeks pregnancy,sacn done today
>> shows mild ventriculomegaly and NT 2.6mm.Her first child is 7yrs old and
>> autistic.No significant family or past history.
>>
>> Planning for anomaly sceening,can the mild ventriculomegaly be taken
>> as very significant.
>>
>> Thank You
>> jayankar

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the ultrasound forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  Ultrasound Forum Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:37:37 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.