-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Markers From: James Smeltzer (James.Smeltzer@wellstar.org) Mon Oct 3 14:01:32 2005 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: James Smeltzer: "Re: Nuchal cord" Previous message: DuBose, Terry: "Re: FW: [OB/GYN (OB)] Fetal and Neonatal Developmental" Hi! I would agree... THe better the equipment the more you see. My mentor once called a calcified fibroid a twin and measured the BPD. THis was on a bistable oscilloscope. Every new generation has produced its own artifacts and "novel" findings that were there all the time, as God has not changed the plan lately in my opinion. The tendency toward obesity is real and tends to undo our technical advances to a certain extent however. Jim >>> evsono@pipeline.com 10/1/2005 4:40:45 PM >>> My personal bias ... is that that certain markers, ie eif or echogenic bowel, are more commonly seen because of higher frequency transducers in the newer machines. Likelihood ratios may need to be recalculated. Art At Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Philippe Jeanty, MD, PhD wrote: > >Just awarness.. I did not notice an increase in the past 10 years or so... > >-----Original Message----- >From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of >MONTSEALEGRE >Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 4:42 PM >To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND >Subject: Re: Markers > >Me also.. > >>>----- Original Message ----- >From: "Mário Libardi" <mariolibardi@uol.com.br> >To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net> >Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 3:33 PM >Subject: Re: Markers > >> Me too... >> >> Mario Libardi, MD >> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "art fougner, md" <evsono@pipeline.com> >> To: "Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND" <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:17 AM >> Subject: Markers >> >>> I've observed that the incidence of echogenic intracardiac foci is >>> increasing. Is this a function of pathophysiology or of improved >>> transducer technology? Or am I simply wrong? Opinions? >>> >>> -- >>> art fougner, md >>> >>> "If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else." >>> Lawrence Peter Berra >>> -- art fougner, md "I knew I was going to take the wrong train, so I left early." Lawrence Peter Berra >>>>>>>>>>>>> Confidentiality Disclaimer <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. ================================================================ Next message: James Smeltzer: "Re: Nuchal cord" Previous message: DuBose, Terry: "Re: FW: [OB/GYN (OB)] Fetal and Neonatal Developmental"

recommended search...
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:32:58 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.