|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Uterine arteries vs ovarianFrom: DuBose, Terry (DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu)Mon Jun 13 10:08:33 2005
That helps a lot. I am starting to get an image (mind's eye) of how the vessel "starts laterally, swings anteriorly and crosses in front of the iliac artery." Will save some images the next time I look at a pelvis transabdominal. Thanks Terry Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM Associate Professor & Director Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563 Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA 501-686-6510 DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/chrp/dms/default.asp http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm --------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- --------------------------------------------------------------- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of --------------------------------------------------------------- James Smeltzer Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 9:37 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Uterine arteries vs ovarian Hi! Looking for 3d of the vascular tree I stumbled on this 3d of the fetal brain: http://cds.ismrm.org/ismrm-2000/PDF2/0355.pdf Here is a radiogram from a uterine embolization. Scroll down to see it. In the pblique lateral view you can see the catheter and it follows into the uterine. In comparison with the injection post embolization on the right you can clearly see that it starts lateraly, swings anteriorly and crosses in front of the iliac artery. These are not labeled but are clear to see. The first three angiographic images all demonstrate this phenomenon: http://www.bocaradiology.com/Procedures/UFE.html In this anatominc labeled dissection on our own web site, the external iliac is not labeled and has been removed but imagine where it was to see the crossing: http://www.obgyn.net/us/placenta-accreta/AN1.jpg This one has the external in it but is harder to understand because of the angle: http://www.obgyn.net/us/placenta-accreta/AN2.jpg Hope this helps! Jim James S. Smeltzer, MD, FACOG, SMFM Consultant, Maternal Fetal Medicine Wellstar Physicians' Group Northwest Women's Care 787 Campbell Hill St Marietta GA 30060 James.Smeltzer@wellstar.org VM 678-290-3035 Off 770-528-0260 Page 404-318-3451
>>> bouthina_ibrahim@yahoo.com 6/11/2005 6:59:30 AM >>> thank you so much one arise ant to ECA IS UTERINE VESSEL NOTCHING IS PATHOLOGICAL???<DuboseTerryJ@uams.edu> wrote:I agree, but these measurements are sometimes taken in the non-pregnant patient. Because so many international luminaries Doppler the uterine arteries, I have only a small doubt about the methods. However, when I look in textbooks at the placement of the various arteries, it seems impossible for the uterine artery to cross both the external iliac artery and vein so consistently. I have not seen an explanation that is clear to me yet. Thanks Terry Terry J. DuBose, M.S., RDMS, FSDMS, FAIUM Associate Professor & Director Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, CHRP 4301 West Markham St. Mail Slot #563 Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205 USA 501-686-6510 DuBoseTerryJ@UAMS.edu http://www.io.com/~dubose/ http://www.uams.edu/chrp/dms/default.asp http://www.obgyn.net/us/panel/panel.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- --------------------------------------------------------------- From: ultrasound@obgyn.net [mailto:ultrasound@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of evsono@pipeline.com Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 7:17 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND Subject: Re: Uterine arteries vs ovarian It would seem that the enlarged pregnant uterus affects anatomical relationships - it's the uterine artery. art
At Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Allen Worrall wrote:
>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- http://www.obgyn.net/displaytranscript.asp?page=/avtranscripts/ISUOG98
harrington
>
-- art fougner, md
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:32:53 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.
