ULTRASOUND Messages for June, 2004: Re: Yolk sac number in multiple gestations (monochorionic)

Re: Yolk sac number in multiple gestations (monochorionic)
From: Terry J DuBose (tjdubose@juno.com)
Sun Jun 27 22:11:47 2004

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: DuBose, Terry: "Unusual cases for comment"
Previous message: patricia carris: "Re: Yolk sac number in multiple gestations (monochorionic)"
Maybe in reply to: Rich Dempsey RDMS/RVT : "Yolk sac number in multiple gestations (monochorionic)"

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
----__JNP_000_6670.5791.4914 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The URL is: http://www.obgyn.net/us/us.asp?page=/us/present/0604/dempsey_yolk
It has been approved by the Editorial Advisory Board, but the URL may not be made public until Monday, when the OBGYN.net folks get to work.
Thanks, Terry
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:06:59 -0500 "patricia carris" <pcarris@hotmail.com> writes: how do I view the image(s) ? Are they posted? P Carris
>From: Latha Natarajan <nattu@bgl.vsnl.net.in>
>Reply-To: ultrasound@obgyn.net
>To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net>
>Subject: Re: Yolk sac number in multiple gestations (monochorionic)
>Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:05:47 -0500
>
> Could this be a case of conjoined twins with 2 y.sacs ?
>
> LN.
> > >
> > >While EV scanning with a student, an early IUP (5.1 wks by GSD)
was > > >seen- a single gestational sac containing 3 cystic structures; the

> > >largest of which was 9mm. The question arose: ? In a single
>gestational
> > >sac (presumably a monochorionic gestation) is it possible to have
3 >yolk
> > >sacs, or can this be a combination of a yolk sac, vitelline
membrane > > >plus possibly an early amniotic membrane. ? No embyronic pole was
seen > > >(yet), no bHCG was available, however LMP and GSD placed this
probable > > >early IUP at 5 weeks.
> > >
> > >Please forgive my hazy ignorance of embryology (and spelling).

MSN Movies - Trailers, showtimes, DVD's, and the latest news from Hollywood! ----__JNP_000_6670.5791.4914 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
The URL is: http://www.obgyn.net/us/us.asp?page=/us/present/0604/dempsey_yolk

It has been approved by the Editorial Advisory Board, but the URL may not be made public until Monday, when the OBGYN.net folks get to work.

Thanks, Terry

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:06:59 -0500 "patricia carris" <pcarris@hotmail.com> writes:

how do I view the image(s) ? Are they posted?
P Carris

>From: Latha Natarajan <nattu@bgl.vsnl.net.in>
>Reply-To: ultrasound@obgyn.net
>To: Multiple recipients of list ULTRASOUND <ultrasound@dns.obgyn.net>
>Subject: Re: Yolk sac number in multiple gestations (monochorionic)
>Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:05:47 -0500
>
>   Could  this  be  a  case  of  conjoined twins  with 2 y.sacs ?
>
>   LN.

>   > >
>   > >While EV scanning with a student, an early IUP (5.1 wks by GSD) was
>   > >seen- a single gestational sac containing 3 cystic structures; the
>   > >largest of which was 9mm.  The question arose: ? In a single
>gestational
>   > >sac (presumably a monochorionic gestation) is it possible to have 3
>yolk
>   > >sacs, or can this be a combination of a yolk sac, vitelline membrane
>   > >plus possibly an early amniotic membrane.  ? No embyronic pole was seen
>   > >(yet), no bHCG was available, however LMP and GSD placed this probable
>   > >early IUP at 5 weeks.
>   > >
>   > >Please forgive my hazy ignorance of embryology (and spelling).

----__JNP_000_6670.5791.4914--

Next message: DuBose, Terry: "Unusual cases for comment"
Previous message: patricia carris: "Re: Yolk sac number in multiple gestations (monochorionic)"
Maybe in reply to: Rich Dempsey RDMS/RVT : "Yolk sac number in multiple gestations (monochorionic)"

Return to Mail a New Message to the Forum: ultrasound@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: terry.dubose@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:36:11 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.